Optimal standards of proof in antitrust
WebNov 16, 2010 · Fueled by economics, antitrust has evolved into a highly sophisticated body of law. Its malleable doctrine enables courts to tailor optimal standards to a wide variety of economic phenomena. Indeed, economic theory has been so revolutionary that modern U.S. competition law bears little resemblance to that which prevailed fifty years ago. Yet, for all … WebApr 4, 2024 · The design of antitrust rules to minimize costs of judicial error in digital markets is our focus. 8 While economic and decision-theoretic analyses have been …
Optimal standards of proof in antitrust
Did you know?
WebJan 1, 2024 · This paper studies how the optimal standard of proof is affected by a specific type of avoidance, namely investments by guilty defendants to mimic innocent … WebOptimal Standards of Proof in Antitrust Murat C. Mungan and Joshua Wrighty July 29, 2024 Abstract Economic analyses of antitrust institutions have thus far focused pre-dominantly …
WebDepending on the screens, i = 0, 1, …, 4, examined, we can then distinguish the following legal standards. Strict per se (SPS) LS is the LS under which the liability decision relies purely on the initial characterisation of the conduct (in stage 0) and the presumption that this generates about its welfare impact.; Modified per se LS (MPS LS): Under this, a liability … WebOptimal standards of proof in antitrust Downloadable (with restrictions)! Economic analyses of antitrust institutions have thus far focused predominantly on optimal penalties and the …
Webdistribution of burdens of proof, standards of proof, and standards of ju. ble in particular cases in the United States and Europe, the application o concepts in similar cases is remarkably similar. Please don’t misunderstand me. I ha said before – and I’ll say it again – that I don’t think that substantive convergence is possible ... WebThe standard of proof used in determining the legality of a firm’s conduct affects not only whether the firm chooses to engage in pro- versus anticompetitive behavior, but also …
WebThe character of the optimum differs markedly from prior results and from conventional understandings of proof burdens. There are important divergences across models in …
Webdictions are more perplexing than the design of evidentiary standards to determine whether parallel conduct stems from collective or from unilateral decisionmaking.4 ... ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Proof of Conspiracy Under Federal Antitrust Laws 69–92 (2010). 12. For a discussion of modern trends involving the expanded use of amnesty systems grantham commercial propertyWebOptimal Standards of Proof in Antitrust. International Review of Law and Economics, Joshua Wright and Murat Mungan, September 2024, Volume 2024, Issue 1. ... We introduce a model to investigate the effects of this additional tradeoff on the optimal standard of proof. The nature of these effects depends upon the relationship between the ... chipboard buildersWebtive actions is not new: it has been a critical part of antitrust enforcement for decades.1 Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure sets forth the standards for obtaining class … chipboard buildbaseWebThe FTC's competition mission is to enforce the rules of the competitive marketplace — the antitrust laws. These laws promote vigorous competition and protect consumers from … grantham community base spittlegate levelWebLast chance to vote in the Concurrences 2024 Antitrust Writing Awards! We invite you to read and vote for these nominated papers authored by the GAI team… The Global Antitrust Institute no LinkedIn: Optimal Standards of Proof in Antitrust chipboard build itWebApr 13, 2024 · The Notice announced today – and sent to approximately 670 companies involved in the marketing of OTC drugs, homeopathic products, dietary supplements, or functional foods – ensures they’re aware of the FTC’s established standards regarding product substantiation and warns them of the substantial financial ramifications if they … grantham community centreWeb"Optimal standards of proof in antitrust," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C). Katsoulacos, Yannis & Ulph, David, 2024. "Regulatory decision errors, Legal Uncertainty and welfare: A general treatment," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 326-352. grantham community harrisburg nc